Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224580›Full record

ArticleIntegrative medicine research2024

Pharmacopuncture therapy for adhesive capsulitis: A pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study.

Doori Kim, Kyoung Sun Park, Sun-A Kim, Ji Yeon Seo, Hyun-Woo Cho, Yoon Jae Lee, Changsop Yang, In-Hyuk Ha, Chang-Hyun Han

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative medicine research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05292482 (Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292482 nacompletednot on this map

Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis : A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJaseng Hospital of Korean MedicineRan2022 to 2022Enrolled21ConditionsAdhesive CapsulitisArmspharmacopuncture therapy, physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Doori KimJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Sun ParkJaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-A KimDaejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeon SeoBucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Woo ChoHaeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jae LeeJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Changsop YangKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
In-Hyuk HaJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Hyun HanKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for adhesive capsulitis (AC), research on pharmacopuncture therapy for AC remains limited. We compared the effectiveness and safety of pharmacopuncture and physiotherapy for AC. Methods: This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group pilot study enrolled patients with limitations of shoulder movement and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score for shoulder pain ≥5 randomized (1:1) to the pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) and physiotherapy (PT) groups. Treatment sessions were administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 13 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was the NRS score for shoulder pain, and the secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), range of motion (ROM), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) scores. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was set as the primary analysis. Results: Among 50 participants, for the primary endpoint (week 7) the PPT group showed a significantly superior improvement in NRS, VAS, SPADI, ROM for flexion, ROM for abduction, and EQ-5D-5L scores. The ROM for extension, ROM for adduction, physical component summary, and patient global impression of change were significantly better in the PPT than in the PT group, and these effects were sustained until week 13. Conclusion: In this pilot study, PPT showed better effects than PT, confirming the feasibility of a follow-up main study. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198).

Indexed as

Adhesive capsulitisPharmacopuncturePhysiotherapyPragmatic trialRandomized controlled trialShoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID39224580
PMCPMC11367127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.