ArticleGalen medical journal2024
Unveiling Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of CABG Recipients versus Non-CABG Patients in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).
Article in Galen medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe history of bypass surgery for coronary arteries and subsequent coronary angioplasty is a crucial and vital issue for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to investigate and compare the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with a history of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) versus those without such a history, specifically focusing on individuals diagnosed with ACS. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cohort study was conducted at Madani Hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Patients diagnosed with ACS who were hospitalized and underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) from the beginning of 2018 to the beginning of 2020 were included. The records for follow-up regarding mortality and cardiovascular events were documented for the next three years (2020 to 2023). Subsequently, patients were categorized into two groups: those with a history of CABG and those without a history of CABG. Patients of each study group were divided into two groups: ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEA)CS/primary PCI and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS)/PCI, a total of approximately 473 cases were collected. The study groups were compared in terms of in-hospital and long-term cardiovascular events as well as other clinical outcomes.
resultsA comparison of hospital and long-term events between the CABG group and the control group demonstrated a significant difference only in cases of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI)/ACS in long-term events (P=0.001). Additionally, comparing hospital and long-term events in the CABG group and the STEACS/NSTEACS control group revealed a significant difference only in cases of recurrent MI/ACS in long-term events (P=0.05).
conclusionPatients with a history of CABG may face a higher risk of cardiovascular events, especially in recurrent MI/ACS. A thorough examination and closer monitoring of this patient group are needed to ensure improvement and mitigate the risks associated with potential complications arising from previous CABG surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.