ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Depth detection limit of a fluorescent object in tissue-like medium with background emission in continuous-wave measurements: a phantom study.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Although the depth detection limit of fluorescence objects in tissue has been studied, reports with a model including noise statistics for designing the optimum measurement configuration are missing. We demonstrate a variance analysis of the depth detection limit toward clinical applications such as noninvasively assessing the risk of aspiration. Aim: It is essential to analyze how the depth detection limit of the fluorescence object in a strong scattering medium depends on the measurement configuration to optimize the configuration. We aim to evaluate the depth detection limit from theoretical analysis and phantom experiments and discuss the source-detector distance that maximizes this limit. Approach: Experiments for detecting a fluorescent object in a biological tissue-mimicking phantom of ground beef with background emission were conducted using continuous wave fluorescence measurements with a point source-detector scheme. The results were analyzed using a model based on the photon diffusion equations. Then, variance analysis of the signal fluctuation was introduced. Results: The model explained the measured fluorescence intensities and their fluctuations well. The variance analysis showed that the depth detection limit in the presence of ambient light increased with the decrease in the source-detector distance, and the optimum distance was in the range of 10 to 15 mm. The depth detection limit was found to be Conclusions: The presented analysis provides a guide for the optimum design of the measurement configuration for detecting fluorescence objects in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.