Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224484›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Healthcare Stakeholder Perspectives on a Value Assessment Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Therapies.

Ryan Fischer, Pat Furlong, Annie Kennedy, Kelly Maynard, Marissa Penrod, Debra Miller, Chamindra G Laverty, Linda P Lowes, Nancy L Kuntz, Perry B Shieh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ryan FischerParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.
Pat FurlongParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-3015
Annie KennedyEveryLife Foundation for Rare Diseases, Washington, DC, USA.
Kelly MaynardLittle Hercules Foundation, Dublin, OH, USA.
Marissa PenrodDuchenne Family Assistance Program, Detroit, MI, USA.
Debra MillerCureduchenne, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Chamindra G LavertyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Linda P LowesCenter for Gene Therapy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nancy L KuntzDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Perry B ShiehDepartment of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jane KondejewskiSNELL Medical Communication, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Peter J NeumannCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason ShafrinFTI Consulting, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8444-5979
Richard J WillkeScintegral Health Economics, Chattanooga, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional value assessment frameworks are challenged in comprehensively assessing the societal value new therapies bring to individuals with rare, progressive, genetic, fatal, neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The objective of this study was to identify how value assessment frameworks may need to be adapted to measure the value to society of DMD therapies. Patients and Methods: Three stakeholder groups (6 patient advocates, 4 clinicians, 3 health economists; N = 13) participated in semi-structured interviews around the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research's Value Flower, which includes elements to consider within value assessments of healthcare technologies. Results: All stakeholders agreed that traditional value assessment frameworks based on the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) are narrow and will undervalue new DMD therapies. All stakeholders expressed some level of concern that using the QALY as a key metric of value discriminates against patients with severe progressive diseases and disabilities. Some stakeholders saw value in using the QALY for cross-disease comparisons in resource-constrained environments if the methodology was appropriate. All stakeholders recommended considering additional elements of value in decision-making around new DMD therapies. These elements reflect: economic and humanistic costs incurred by patients, caregivers, and families with Duchenne, such as indirect out-of-pocket costs, lost productivity, and family spillovers; meaningful attributes for individuals with disabilities and high unmet need, such as severity of disease, value of hope, and real option value; and factors that contribute to improvements in population health, such as insurance value, equity, and scientific spillovers. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need to expand traditional value assessment frameworks and take a holistic approach that incorporates the perspectives of individuals with Duchenne, caregivers, clinicians, and health economists when assessing the societal value of new DMD therapies. Broadening value assessment will prevent restricted or delayed access to therapies for individuals with Duchenne.

Indexed as

ISPOR value flowerqualitative researchrare diseasesvalue assessment framework

Identifiers

PMID39224484
PMCPMC11368110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.