ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2024
Impact of Oropharyngeal Stimulation during Laryngeal Mask Insertion on Cardiovascular Response in adult patients. A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion has been found to reduce cardiovascular responses when compared to laryngoscopy and intubation. This research aimed to examine the impact of various techniques employed for LMA insertion on cardiovascular response. Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 90 elective surgery candidates divided into three groups of 30. All patients underwent similar anesthesia. The LMA was inserted using the classical technique, 180° rotation technique, and face-to-face triple maneuver technique (FFTMT). The cardiovascular responses, the success rate of LMA placement, and other outcomes were documented and compared among the three methods. Results: The study revealed that the blood pressure of patients 10 minutes after LMA insertion using the rotational technique was higher than the standard technique ( Conclusion: The findings of the present investigation indicated that implementing the classic technique for LMA placement resulted in a more consistent blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) response than the 180° rotation and FFTMT. Furthermore, the classical method exhibited a marginally lower success rate in terms of LMA insertion than the alternative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.