Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224415›Full record

ArticleEplasty2024

The Bilobed Flap - Critical Analysis and New Mathematically Precise Design.

Imran Pathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Imran PathanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Apex Hospitals, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A bilobed flap is a workhorse flap to reconstruct the lower third of the nasal defect. It has been described as a double transposition flap. Various changes have been proposed to reduce the drawbacks of this flap. Most of the modifications pay attention to flap width and length without emphasizing the pivot point. In this article, the classic Zitelli design is tested for its mathematical precision, and the key role of the pivot point is discussed. Method: The bilobed flap was designed with accurate mathematical measurement on simple drawing software. Its design and flap movement were studied and critically analyzed. The biogeometry of the flap was investigated with multiple diagrams and various mathematical principles. Results: The classic description carries some mathematical errors. The author describes a new design that is more precise mathematically. A proper pivot point location is vital for accurate design and flaps movement. Putting the pivot point at a distance 2.6 times the radius of the defect makes the movement of the flaps precise. In a proper design, the extension of secondary flap length is an optional step, and the dog-ear so formed can be tackled separately. This new design of the bilobed flap only needs rotation advancement movement. Conclusions: The bilobed flap is one of the major tools for lower third nasal reconstruction. A perfectly designed bilobed flap is primarily a rotation flap. A slight modification of classic design by putting the pivot point at a distance 2.6 times of the radius of the defect makes it more perfect mathematically.

Indexed as

Bilobed FlapDesignFlapZitelli's Flap

Identifiers

PMID39224415
PMCPMC11367157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.