ArticleEplasty2024
The Bilobed Flap - Critical Analysis and New Mathematically Precise Design.
Article in Eplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A bilobed flap is a workhorse flap to reconstruct the lower third of the nasal defect. It has been described as a double transposition flap. Various changes have been proposed to reduce the drawbacks of this flap. Most of the modifications pay attention to flap width and length without emphasizing the pivot point. In this article, the classic Zitelli design is tested for its mathematical precision, and the key role of the pivot point is discussed. Method: The bilobed flap was designed with accurate mathematical measurement on simple drawing software. Its design and flap movement were studied and critically analyzed. The biogeometry of the flap was investigated with multiple diagrams and various mathematical principles. Results: The classic description carries some mathematical errors. The author describes a new design that is more precise mathematically. A proper pivot point location is vital for accurate design and flaps movement. Putting the pivot point at a distance 2.6 times the radius of the defect makes the movement of the flaps precise. In a proper design, the extension of secondary flap length is an optional step, and the dog-ear so formed can be tackled separately. This new design of the bilobed flap only needs rotation advancement movement. Conclusions: The bilobed flap is one of the major tools for lower third nasal reconstruction. A perfectly designed bilobed flap is primarily a rotation flap. A slight modification of classic design by putting the pivot point at a distance 2.6 times of the radius of the defect makes it more perfect mathematically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39224415PMC11367157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.