ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024
A Systems Biology Approach to the Pathogenesis of Celiac Disease: Identification of Potential Protective and Promoting Mechanisms.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Key Biomarkers in Celiac Disease through Analysis of Microarray Data.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Celiac disease (CeD) is an autoimmune enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten. Almost 90% of CeD patients have HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 haplotypes. As a high proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of CeD patients have the same haplotype, it is assumed that they are at a higher risk of disease development than the general population. Nevertheless, the prevalence of CeD among FDRs is considerably low (7.5%). Materials and Methods: In order to figure out this discrepancy, a microarray dataset of intestinal mucosal biopsies of CeD patients, FDRs, and control groups was reanalyzed, and a protein-protein interaction network was constructed. Results: Principal component analysis showed that CeD and FDR groups are far away in terms of gene expression. Comparing differentially expressed genes of both networks demonstrated inverse expression of some genes mainly related to cell cycle mechanisms. Moreover, analysis of the modular structures of up- and downregulated gene networks determined activation of protein degradation mechanisms and inhibition of ribosome-related protein synthesis in celiac patients with an upside-down pattern in FDRs. Conclusions: The top-down systems biology approach determined some regulatory pathways with inverse function in CeD and FDR groups. These genes and molecular mechanisms could be a matter of investigation as potential druggable targets or prognostic markers in CeD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.