ArticleHeliyon2024
Alternation of gene expression in brain-derived exosomes after cerebral ischemic preconditioning in mice.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles in cancer - therapeutic and diagnostic potential.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cerebral ischemic preconditioning is a neuroprotective therapy against cerebral ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study aims to demonstrate the alternation of gene expression in exosomes from brain tissue of mice after ischemic preconditioning and their potential functions. Methods: Ten mice were divided into the sham and the cerebral ischemic preconditioning groups. Their brain tissues were harvested, from which the exosomes were extracted. The characteristics and protective effects of exosomes were evaluated. Whole transcriptome sequencing was used to demonstrate the gene expression discrepancy between the exosomes from the two groups of mice brains. Volcano graphs and heatmaps were used to picture the difference in expression quantity of mRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA. Gene ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed to demonstrate the functions of differentially expressed RNAs. Results: Exosomes were successfully extracted, and those from the cerebral ischemic preconditioning group had better protective effects on cells that received oxygen-glucose deprivation and restoration injury. A total of 306 mRNAs and 374 lncRNAs were significantly upregulated, and 320 mRNAs and 405 lncRNAs were significantly downregulated in the preconditioning group. No circRNAs were differentially expressed between the two groups. GO and KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the functions of differentially expressed RNAs were related to both neural protective and injurious effects. Conclusion: The brain-derived exosomes may participate in the neuroprotective effect of cerebral ischemic preconditioning. Thorough research is necessary to investigate exosome functions derived from the ischemic preconditioned brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.