ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of the bicharacteristic attention residual pyramid for the treatment of brain tumors.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, surgery remains the primary treatment for craniocerebral tumors. Before doctors perform surgeries, they need to determine the surgical plan according to the shape, location, and size of the tumor; however, various conditions of different patients make the tumor segmentation task challenging. To improve the accuracy of determining tumor shape and realizing edge segmentation, a U-shaped network combining a residual pyramid module and a dual feature attention module is proposed. The residual pyramid module can enlarge the receptive field, extract multiscale features, and fuse original information, which solves the problem caused by the feature pyramid pooling where the local information is not related to the remote information. In addition, the dual feature attention module is proposed to replace the skip connection in the original U-Net network, enrich the features, and improve the attention of the model to space and channel features with large amounts of information to be used for more accurate brain tumor segmentation. To evaluate the performance of the proposed model, experiments were conducted on the public datasets Kaggle_3M and BraTS2021. Because the model proposed in this study is applicable to two-dimensional image segmentation, it is necessary to obtain the crosscutting images of fair class in the BraTS2021 dataset in advance. Results show that the model accuracy, Jaccard similarity coefficient, Dice similarity coefficient, and false negative rate (FNR) on the Kaggle_3M dataset are 0.9395, 0.8812, 0.8958, and 0.007, respectively. The model accuracy, Jaccard similarity coefficient, Dice similarity coefficient, and FNR on the BraTS2021 dataset were 0.9375, 0.9072, 0.8981, and 0.0087, respectively. Compared with existing algorithms, all the indicators of the proposed algorithm have been improved, but the proposed model still has certain limitations and has not been applied to actual clinical trials. For specific datasets, the generalization ability of the model needs to be further improved. In the future work, the model will be further improved to address the aforementioned limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.