ArticleHeliyon2024
A systematic review and meta-analysis of ischemia-modified albumin in diabetes mellitus.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cord blood cardiac markers and tissue doppler echocardiography findings in infants of diabetic mothers.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: There is an ongoing search for novel biomarkers of diabetes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the serum concentrations of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), a candidate biomarker of oxidative stress, acidosis, and ischemia, in patients with pre-diabetes, different types of diabetes mellitus (type 1, T1DM, type 2, T2DM, and gestational, GDM), and healthy controls. Methods: We searched for case-control studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to December 31, 2023. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE, respectively. Results: In 29 studies, T2DM patients had significantly higher IMA concentrations when compared to controls (standard mean difference, SMD = 1.83, 95 % CI 1.46 to 2.21, p˂0.001; I Conclusion: Our study suggests that IMA is a promising biomarker for determining the presence of oxidative stress, acidosis, and ischemia in pre-diabetes and T1DM, T2DM, and GDM. However, the utility of measuring circulating IMA warrants confirmation in prospective studies investigating clinical endpoints in pre-diabetes and in different types of diabetes (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024504690).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.