ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Bioelectrical impedance phase angle and the mortality in critically ill children.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Physical Activity and Nutritional Patterns on Phase Angle in Healthy Adolescents.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Reference percentiles for evaluating phase angle using bioelectrical impedance analysis in Chinese children aged 6-11 years.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Editorial of Special Issue "Nutrition and Critical Illness".Nutrients · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phase angle (PhA) is a variable obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). It is highly sensitive and specific and is commonly used in clinical nutrition assessment. Recently, PhA has shown promise in predicting clinical outcomes, especially as a new indicator of mortality, but its use in pediatric research is limited. This study aims to investigate the association between PhA measured at admission using BIA and PICU length of stay (LOS) and 60-day mortality in critically ill children and adolescents. Methods: A consecutive series of pediatric patients in the PICU underwent BIA measurements within 72 h of admission. All patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient demographics, anthropometric measurements, pediatric index of mortality 2 score (PIM-2), and laboratory exams were recorded. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves were constructed based on the critical PhA value to assess differences in survival status within the 60-day window. Multivariate cox regression model was employed to illustrate the relationship between PhA and 60-day mortality rates. The Youden's index method was used to identify the critical cut-off value for PhA in relation to mortality rates. ROC curves provided the area under the curve (AUC) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 205 pediatric patients (118 boys) were included, with a mean age of 9.2 years (±6.0). Survival curves indicated a cutoff value of 3.1°, with higher survival in patients with PhA ≥3.1° compared to those with PhA <3.1° ( Conclusion: Low PhA in patients is associated with longer PICU LOS and an increased risk of PICU patient mortality. PhA not only serves as an indicator for monitoring pediatric nutrition but also as a prognostic indicator for PICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.