Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224030›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

High failure rate but promising clinical performance after implantation of a flexible medial meniscus prosthesis at 1-year follow-up.

Branco S van Minnen, Petra J C Heesterbeek, Koen C Defoort, Pieter J Emans, Ewoud R A van Arkel, Thijmen Struik, Liesbeth M Jutten, Saskia Susan, Sebastiaan A W van de Groes, Nico Verdonschot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Branco S van MinnenRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-4167
Petra J C HeesterbeekSint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-8907
Koen C DefoortSint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-205X
Pieter J EmansMaastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-5525
Ewoud R A van ArkelHaaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-8686
Thijmen StruikRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-5576
Liesbeth M JuttenMaastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4919
Saskia SusanSint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan A W van de GroesRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-9071
Nico VerdonschotRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-6523
Tony G van TienenRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2005-0550

Funding

ATRO Medical BV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAfter unsatisfactory results in a first-in-human clinical investigation with an anatomically shaped medial meniscus prosthesis, the prosthesis and its fixation technique were altered. This interim analysis of a prospective single-arm clinical investigation aims to evaluate safety and clinical performance in a first-in-human study with the redesigned meniscus prosthesis system.

methodsTen patients suffering from medial postmeniscectomy pain syndrome were treated with the meniscus prosthesis. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained at baseline and at 6-week, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained to evaluate joint degeneration and prosthesis location.

resultsThe device alterations resolved the issues occurring with the previous design, but four prostheses were explanted after fixation failure or subluxation of the prosthesis. Five out of six patients who reached 1-year follow-up reported a clinically significant improvement of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score pain subscale. Imaging revealed no adverse effects on joint degeneration.

conclusionThe failure mechanisms that occurred with the previous design have been resolved, but the new fixation technique introduced new safety issues. Improvement of positioning and fixation techniques are considered essential future adaptations to reduce the risk of failure. The good clinical outcomes reported by the patients reaching 1-year follow-up indicate that the medial meniscus prosthesis is a potential solution for patients suffering from postmeniscectomy pain syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisMenisci, TibialProsthesis FailureAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesProsthesis Designartificial meniscusclinical investigationmeniscus prosthesismeniscus replacementpostmeniscectomy pain syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39224030
PMCPMC12022821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.