ArticleAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2024
[Analysis of serious trauma injury patterns in Navarre (Spain) (2010-2019)].
Article in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- When Pedestrian Crossings Become Danger Zones: Trauma and Mortality Risks in Elderly Pedestrians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- [Progress and challenges in Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra. Insights from 2024].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to describe major trauma cases in Navarre and analyze differences based on mortality groups, sex, and mode of injury.
methodsCross-sectional study of major traumas (severity =3) registered in Navarre between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed the type of trauma, intentionality, the mode of injury, and the affected anatomical area. The odds ratio for major trauma associated with different variables was calculated.
resultsThe study included 2,609 patients; mean age was 54.7 years (0-101) and 70.9% were male. A predominance of accidental (84%) / blunt (94.7%) major traumas was recorded, primarily resulting from falls (46.5%) and car accidents (18.4%). Women experienced more falls and pedestrian accidents, while men had more motorcycle, bicycle, knife/firearm accidents, and contusions. Most major traumas affected the head and thorax. Head trauma was significantly more common in deceased individuals and women, while thoracic trauma was more frequent in patients who died on-site and in men. Head injuries were caused by falls from low heights and firearms, whereas thoracic injuries resulted from car accidents and falls from height. The risk of major trauma decreased with age; deceased patients were between two and three times more likely to present lesions in all anatomical areas.
conclusionsGender differences are observed in intentionality, type, and mode of injury. Head and thoracic injuries are potentially life-threatening and abdominal and extremity/pelvic ring injuries are associated with early deaths. This suggests that the extent and severity of these injuries complicate treatment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.