Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223789›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies

Comparison of Effects Between Telerehabilitation and In-Person Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Leonardo Breno do Nascimento de Aviz, Camila Ferreira Alves, Carolina Lima da Fonte, Lorena de Nazaré Rocha Corrêa, Raphaely Cristiny Sanches Progênio, Laerte Jonatas Leray Guedes, Laura Maria Tomazi Neves, Saul Rassy Carneiro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonardo Breno do Nascimento de AvizFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-660X
Camila Ferreira AlvesFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Carolina Lima da FonteFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Lorena de Nazaré Rocha CorrêaFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Raphaely Cristiny Sanches ProgênioFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Laerte Jonatas Leray GuedesFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Laura Maria Tomazi NevesFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Saul Rassy CarneiroFederal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects between telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation on physical function, pain and quality of life in patients with breast cancer after surgery.

designRandomized, controlled, and parallel study that involved post-surgical oncological breast surgery patients who were female and aged between 18 and 70 years. The study was conducted in an outpatient environment, and the participants were randomized using a computer system. Population was divided into 2 groups: G1 (n = 20), who received face-to-face care, and G2 (n = 24), who received telerehabilitation. Participants were followed for 15 and 45 days postoperatively. The study's primary outcomes were based on 44 patients (n = 44). Values of changes in quality of life, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, and upper limb functionality were compared for both groups during the 15 to 45 day postoperative.

resultsBoth groups exhibited progressive improvements in range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, and quality of life over time (15- and 45-days post-operatively [PO]), indicating a positive response to treatment. Patients in G2 demonstrated more significant improvements in range of motion and muscle strength, as well as better functionality and quality of life compared to G1, particularly after 45 days PO. Additionally, G2 exhibited a more significant reduction in fatigue after 45 days PO.

conclusionsTelerehabilitation is a viable option with good usability, and has been shown to produce results similar to in-person physiotherapy in most cases, and even superior in some. Long-term intervention studies are needed for the development of telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularTelerehabilitationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthYoung Adultbreast cancerpostoperative periodtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39223789
PMCPMC11369863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.