Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223609›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Enhlink infers distal and context-specific enhancer-promoter linkages.

Olivier B Poirion, Wulin Zuo, Catrina Spruce, Candice N Baker, Sandra L Daigle, Ashley Olson, Daniel A Skelly, Elissa J Chesler, Christopher L Baker, Brian S White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olivier B PoirionThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. o.poirion@gmail.com.
Wulin ZuoThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Catrina SpruceThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Candice N BakerThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Sandra L DaigleThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Ashley OlsonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Daniel A SkellyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Elissa J CheslerThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Christopher L Baker *The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Brian S White *The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Project 5: Circadian RhythmsP50DA039841 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2016 to 2026
$26.2M
Cellular Systems Genetic Approaches to Understanding Regulatory VariationR35GM133724 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Christopher Lee Baker · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039841NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhlink is a computational tool for scATAC-seq data analysis, facilitating precise interrogation of enhancer function at the single-cell level. It employs an ensemble approach incorporating technical and biological covariates to infer condition-specific regulatory DNA linkages. Enhlink can integrate multi-omic data for enhanced specificity, when available. Evaluation with simulated and real data, including multi-omic datasets from the mouse striatum and novel promoter capture Hi-C data, demonstrate that Enhlink outperfoms alternative methods. Coupled with eQTL analysis, it identified a putative super-enhancer in striatal neurons. Overall, Enhlink offers accuracy, power, and potential for revealing novel biological insights in gene regulation.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCorpus StriatumMiceQuantitative Trait LociSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareChromatin accessibilityEnhancers inferenceLinkage analysisMachine-learningSingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID39223609
PMCPMC11368035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.