ArticleBMC women's health2024
Usability of a smartphone-compatible, confocal micro-endoscope for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore efficient methods to detect and treat precancerous lesions of the cervix at a single visit, such as low-cost confocal microscopy, could improve early diagnosis and hence outcomes. We piloted a prototype smartphone-compatible confocal micro-endoscope (SCME) among women presenting to a public cervical cancer screening clinic in Kampala, Uganda. We describe the piloting of the SCME device at an urban clinic used by lower cadre staff.
methodsWe screened women aged 18 and 60 years, who presented for cervical cancer screening at the Kawempe National Referral Hospital Kampala, and evaluated the experience of their providers (nurses). Nurses received a 2-day training by the study doctors on how to use the SCME, which was added to the standard Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA)-based cervical cancer screening. The SCME was used to take colposcopy images before and after VIA at positions 12 and 6 O'clock if VIA negative, and on precancer-suspicious lesions if VIA positive. We used questionnaires to assess the women's experiences after screening, and the experience of the nurses who operated the SCME.
resultsBetween November 2021 and July 2022, we screened 291 women with a median age of 36 years and 65.7% were HIV positive. Of the women screened, 146 were eligible for VIA, 123 were screened with the SCME, and we obtained confocal images from 103 women. Of those screened with the SCME, 60% found it comfortable and 81% were willing to screen again with it. Confocal images from 79% of the women showed distinguishable cellular features, while images from the remaining 21% were challenging to analyze. Nurses reported a mean score of 85% regarding the SCME's usefulness to their work, 71% regarding their satisfaction and willingness to use it again, 63% in terms of ease of use, and 57% concerning the ease of learning how to operate the SCME.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate the feasibility of using the SCME by lower cadre staff in low-resource settings to aid diagnosis of precancerous lesions. However, more work is needed to make it easier for providers to learn how to operate the SCME and capture high-quality confocal images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.