ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
Optimization and validation of echo times of point-resolved spectroscopy for cystathionine detection in gliomas.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Cystathionine and 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Brain Tumors.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Correction: Optimization and validation of echo times of point-resolved spectroscopy for cystathionine detection in gliomas.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCystathionine accumulates selectively in 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, and can serve as a possible noninvasive biomarker. This study aims to optimize the echo time (TE) of point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) for cystathionine detection in gliomas, and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PRESS for 1p/19q-codeletion identification.
methodsThe TE of PRESS was optimized with numerical and phantom analysis to better resolve cystathionine from the overlapping aspartate multiplets. The optimized and 97 ms TE PRESS were then applied to 84 prospectively enrolled patients suspected of glioma or glioma recurrence to examine the influence of aspartate on cystathionine quantification by fitting the spectra with and without aspartate. The diagnostic performance of PRESS for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas were assessed.
resultsThe TE of PRESS was optimized as (TE1, TE2) = (17 ms, 28 ms). The spectral pattern of cystathionine and aspartate were consistent between calculation and phantom. The mean concentrations of cystathionine in vivo fitting without aspartate were significantly higher than those fitting with full basis-set for 97 ms TE PRESS (1.97 ± 2.01 mM vs. 1.55 ± 1.95 mM, p < 0.01), but not significantly different for 45 ms method (0.801 ± 1.217 mM and 0.796 ± 1.217 mM, p = 0.494). The cystathionine concentrations of 45 ms approach was better correlated with those of edited MRS than 97 ms counterparts (r = 0.68 vs. 0.49, both p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas were 66.7% and 73.7% for 45 ms method, and 44.4% and 52.5% for 97 ms method, respectively.
conclusionThe 45 ms TE PRESS yields more precise cystathionine estimates than the 97 ms method, and is anticipated to facilitate noninvasive diagnosis of 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, and treatment response monitoring in those patients. Medium diagnostic performance of PRESS for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas were observed, and warrants further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.