Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223515›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on HIV prevention and treatment services for key populations in South Africa: an interrupted time series analysis.

Danwei Yao, Naomi Hill, Ben Brown, Dorian Gule, Matshidiso Chabane, Mfezi Mcingana, Kalai Willis, Vusi Shiba, Oluwasolape Olawore, Dawie Nel and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Danwei YaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Naomi HillWits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ben BrownAnova Health Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Dorian GuleOUT LGBT Well-Being, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matshidiso ChabaneAurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mfezi McinganaTB HIV Care, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kalai WillisDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Vusi ShibaWits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Oluwasolape OlaworeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Dawie NelOUT LGBT Well-Being, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jacqueline PienaarAurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Johanna TheunissenPanagora Group, Silver Spring, USA.
Katherine RucinskiDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Katie ReichertPanagora Group, Silver Spring, USA.
Lauren ParmleyUSAID/Southern Africa, Bilateral Health Office, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Joseph LawrenceUSAID/Southern Africa, Bilateral Health Office, Pretoria, South Africa.
Stefan BaralDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Amrita RaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. arao24@jhu.edu.

Funding

Implementation Research to Optimize ART Delivery for Adolescents and Young Adults Living with HIVK01MH129226 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine B Rucinski · 2022 to 2026
$792k
Program and implementation context of a housing support initiative to address homelessness and improve HIV service uptake among youth in the United StatesK01MD020002 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Amrita Rao · 2024 to 2026
$381k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD020002NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH129226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey populations (KP), including men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW), and transgender women (TGW), experience a disproportionate burden of HIV, even in generalized epidemics like South Africa. Given this disproportionate burden and unique barriers to accessing health services, sustained provision of care is particularly relevant. It is unclear how the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated restrictions may have impacted this delivery. In this study, we aimed to describe patterns of engagement in HIV prevention and treatment services among KP in South Africa and assess the impact of different COVID-19 restriction levels on service delivery.

methodsWe leveraged programmatic data collected by the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported KP partners in South Africa. We divided data into three discrete time periods based on national COVID-19 restriction periods: (i) Pre-restriction period, (ii) High-level restriction period, and (iii) After-high level restriction period. Primary outcomes included monthly total HIV tests, new HIV cases identified, new initiations of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and new enrollments in antiretroviral therapy (ART). We conducted interrupted time series segmented regression analyses to estimate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on HIV prevention and treatment service utilization.

resultsBetween January 2018 and June 2022, there were a total of 231,086 HIV tests, 27,051 HIV positive cases, 27,656 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiations, and 15,949 antiretroviral therapy initiations among MSM, FSW and TGW in PEPFAR-supported KP programs in South Africa. We recorded 90,457 total HIV tests during the 'pre-restriction' period, with 13,593 confirmed new HIV diagnoses; 26,134 total HIV tests with 2,771 new diagnoses during the 'high-level restriction' period; and 114,495 HIV tests with 10,687 new diagnoses during the after high-level restriction period. Our Poisson regression model estimates indicate an immediate and significant decrease in service engagement at the onset of COVID-19 restrictions, including declines in HIV testing, treatment, and PrEP use, which persisted. As programs adjusted to the new restrictions, there was a gradual rebound in service engagement, particularly among MSM and FSW. Towards the end of the high-level restriction period, with some aspects of daily life returning to normal but others still restricted, there was more variability. Some indicators continued to improve, while others stagnated or decreased.

conclusionService provision rebounded from the initial shock created by pandemic-related restrictions, and HIV services were largely maintained for KP in South Africa. These results suggest that HIV service delivery among programs designed for KP was able to be flexible and resilient to the evolving restrictions. The results of this study can inform plans for future pandemics and large-scale disruptions to the delivery of HIV services.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsInterrupted Time Series AnalysisAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSex WorkersSouth AfricaTransgender PersonsCOVID-19Female sex workersGay and other men who have sex with menHIVInterrupted time seriesKey populationsService deliverySouth AfricaTransgender women

Identifiers

PMID39223515
PMCPMC11370299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.