ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
The management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults at a rural regional hospital in KwaZulu Natal.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPneumonia stands as a significant global contributor to mortality, particularly in South Africa, where it ranks as the second leading cause of death. The country's high prevalence of HIV infection compounds this issue, significantly increasing mortality rates associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
objectiveThis study aimed to audit CAP patient management at a regional rural hospital in KwaZulu-Natal.
methodA retrospective review of patient files from September to December 2016 was undertaken. Data extraction from clinical files, conducted according to inclusion criteria, was transferred to a data collection sheet and analyzed using SPSS version 21.
resultsThe review encompassed 124 patient files over four months, revealing that 117 (94.4%) patients were not managed by the Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Medicines List for South Africa. Of the patients admitted with CAP, 54% were HIV positive, and 49 (39.5%) patients succumbed to the illness. Notably, none of the patients underwent assessment using a severity score.
conclusionThe findings underscore a need for more adherence to South African guidelines for managing CAP among staff at the rural regional hospital. This leads to severe consequences, exemplified by the high mortality rate. Urgent intervention is required to incorporate severity assessment scores into pneumonia evaluations, thus enabling appropriate clinical management. CONTRIBUTION: This study sheds light on the significant impact of CAP within the South African hospital context, delineating critical gaps in clinical care and emphasizing the imperative to address clinical inertia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.