Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223507›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Revolutionizing breast ultrasound diagnostics with EfficientNet-B7 and Explainable AI.

M Latha, P Santhosh Kumar, R Roopa Chandrika, T R Mahesh, V Vinoth Kumar, Suresh Guluwadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M LathaDepartment of Information Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
P Santhosh KumarDepartment of Information Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
R Roopa ChandrikaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education(Deemed to be University, Coimbatore, India.
T R MaheshDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, 562112, India.
V Vinoth KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, 632014, India.
Suresh GuluwadiAdama Science and Technology University, Adama, 302120, Ethiopia. suresh.guluwadi@astu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality among women globally, necessitating precise classification of breast ultrasound images for early diagnosis and treatment. Traditional methods using CNN architectures such as VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet, though somewhat effective, often struggle with class imbalances and subtle texture variations, leading to reduced accuracy for minority classes such as malignant tumors. To address these issues, we propose a methodology that leverages EfficientNet-B7, a scalable CNN architecture, combined with advanced data augmentation techniques to enhance minority class representation and improve model robustness. Our approach involves fine-tuning EfficientNet-B7 on the BUSI dataset, implementing RandomHorizontalFlip, RandomRotation, and ColorJitter to balance the dataset and improve model robustness. The training process includes early stopping to prevent overfitting and optimize performance metrics. Additionally, we integrate Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, such as Grad-CAM, to enhance the interpretability and transparency of the model's predictions, providing visual and quantitative insights into the features and regions of ultrasound images influencing classification outcomes. Our model achieves a classification accuracy of 99.14%, significantly outperforming existing CNN-based approaches in breast ultrasound image classification. The incorporation of XAI techniques enhances our understanding of the model's decision-making process, thereby increasing its reliability and facilitating clinical adoption. This comprehensive framework offers a robust and interpretable tool for the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer, advancing the capabilities of automated diagnostic systems and supporting clinical decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerBreast ultrasound imagingData augmentationDeep learningEfficientNetFine-tuningGrad-CamImage classification

Identifiers

PMID39223507
PMCPMC11367906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.