SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Does it stable? Intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement might be the warning signals: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comment on "Does it stable? Intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement might be the warning signals: a meta-analysis of observational studies".Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Value of Aneurysm Wall Enhancement in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (MR-VWI) is an emerging imaging technology used to assess the progressive risk of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Unlike the standard evaluation model, MR-VWI is still debatable. This study aims to further define the potential relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) and aneurysm stability. Using "intracranial aneurysm", "magnetic resonance", and "enhancement" as keywords, relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, and the qualified studies were enrolled for further analysis. There were 13 case-control studies, 4 cohort studies, and 2,678 cases of intracranial aneurysms included in the meta-analysis. It was shown that AWE was correlated with intracranial aneurysm rupture (OR = 35.90, 95% CI: 15.58 to 82.75, p < 0.001), growth (OR = 6.69, 95% CI: 2.69 to 16.63, p < 0.001), and presence of symptoms (OR = 14.46, 95% CI: 9.07 to 23.05, p < 0.001). This finding had a high diagnostic value, but the correlation was probably not independent of aneurysm size. The pooled relative risks of the follow-up studies revealed that the risk of UIA progression was approximately 3.33 times higher with AWE than without AWE (RR = 3.33, 95% CI: 2.33 to 4.78, p < 0.001). In addition, the pooled results demonstrated that quantitative indices of VWI enhancement were equally linked with aneurysm stability (OR = 19.61, 95% CI: 10.63 to 36.17, p < 0.001). AWE is an effective imaging method to assess the stability of UIAs, and it can be a marker for the prophylactic treatment of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the future, which remains to be validated by prospective studies with large samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39223389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.