Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39223309›Full record

Observational studyArchives of osteoporosis2024

First year report of the IMSS Multicenter Hip Fracture Registry.

José Octavio Duarte-Flores, Joel Alonso Cortez-Sarabia, Sergio Sánchez-García, Juan Humberto Medina-Chávez, Sara Georgina Castro-Flores, Carlos Alberto Borboa-García, Ivan Luján-Hernández, Gabriela Guadalupe López-Hernández

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

José Octavio Duarte-FloresGeriatric Service of HGZ 83 IMSS, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico. dr.duarte.geriatra86@gmail.com.
Joel Alonso Cortez-SarabiaGeriatric Service of HGR 180 IMSS, Tlajomulco, Jalisco, Mexico.
Sergio Sánchez-GarcíaEpidemiological and Health Services Research Unit, Aging Area, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Humberto Medina-ChávezClinical Excellence Division, Medical Benefits Directorate, Mexico City, México.
Sara Georgina Castro-FloresGeriatrics Service of HGR 46, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Carlos Alberto Borboa-GarcíaGeriatrics Service of HGZ 89, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Ivan Luján-HernándezGeriatrics Service of HGZ-MF 16, Torreon, Coahuila, Mexico.
Gabriela Guadalupe López-HernándezGeriatrics Service of HGZ MF 21, Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.

Funding

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social R-2022-1603-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population has aged; there is a greater risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture. We describe the standards of care for hip fractures in various hospitals of Mexico. A total of 1042 subjects participated. The acute mortality was 4.3%. SIGNIFICANCE: Hip fracture registries provide a means to compare care and establish improvement processes.

backgroundThe Mexican population has aged; thus, there is a greater risk of osteoporosis, and its main consequence is hip fracture due to fragility. Its incidence is high, and it is expected to increase due to aging in our country. International guidelines provide standardized recommendations for the care of people with hip fractures, while hip fracture registries provide a means to compare care with local, national, and international clinical standards and establish improvement processes.

objectiveDescribe the standards of care for hip fractures in various hospital centers of the Mexican Social Security Institute.

methodsThis was an observational, multicenter, longitudinal, and descriptive study. It included 24 hospital centers in Mexico. Informed consent was obtained. Data were recorded during the hospital stay, epidemiological data, and management, and follow-up was carried out 30 and 120 days after discharge. The information was analyzed using SPSS version 22.0.

resultsA total of 1042 subjects aged 79.5 ± 7.6 years participated, mostly women (n = 739; 70.9%) from the community (n = 1,021; 98.0%) and with functional independence (Barthel 80.9 ± 22.2). The transfer time to the emergency room was 4.6 ± 14.6 days. Pertrochanteric hip fracture was the most common (n = 570, 54.7%). The most common type of procedure was dynamic hip screw (DHS) (n = 399; 40.1%). Documented thromboprophylaxis was granted in 91.5% (n = 953) and antibiotic prophylaxis in 53.0% (n = 552) of the patients. The goal of 36 h for the surgical procedure was achieved in 7.6% of the subjects (n = 76), with the most frequent cause being a delay in scheduling (n = 673, 67.6%). The mean time from emergency room to surgery was 7.8 ± 7.0 days. The acute mortality rate was 4.3%. Secondary pharmacologic prevention upon discharge occurred in 64.2% of patients. At 30 days, 370 subjects (37.1%) were lost to follow-up, with a mortality of 3%, while at 120 days, 166 subjects (27.8%) were lost, with a mortality of 2.8%.

conclusionIn the hospital centers where the study was carried out, there are still no standards of care for hip fractures, which makes it necessary to rethink the care for this population group through a strategy focused on meeting those standards.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesRegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMexicoOsteoporotic FracturesHip fractureOlder adultOrthogeriatricRegistry

Identifiers

PMID39223309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.