Observational studyScientific reports2024
Evaluating a novel method for vitamin A analysis in an observational study of the UAE's obese population.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Rho/PAK signaling: a key driver of anthracycline and taxane resistance in breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Harnessing natural sunlight indoors: sensor-regulated therapeutic approach to enhance vitamin D status in humans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel LC-MS/MS analysis of vitamin D metabolites in mice serum and hair: impact of diet and light exposure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vitamin A plays a critical role in various biological functions, including vision, cellular differentiation, and immune regulation. However, accurately assessing its status, particularly in obese individuals, presents challenges due to potential alterations in metabolism and distribution. This study utilized Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology to precisely measure serum vitamin A concentrations in population of UAE. The methodology's reliability and precision, as demonstrated through validation procedures, underscore its potential utility in clinical settings. Employing the Multiple Reaction Monitoring mode of positive ion electrospray ionization, the LC-MS/MS system achieves a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.48 ng/mL in serum, while adhering to FDA-US regulations for accuracy and compliance. A key aspect of this study was the application of LC-MS/MS to assess vitamin A status in an obese population within UAE. By employing a diverse cohort of 452 Emirati participants, including 277 individuals from a randomized controlled trial who were assessed at baseline and at 6th month, and 175 healthy individuals aged 18-82 assessed at baseline, this study explores the relationship between obesity and vitamin A levels, shedding light on potential implications for health and well-being. It was an observational study based on a new vitamin A method and participants were asked to eat vitamin A rich foods. The robust performance of the LC-MS/MS methodology positions it as a valuable tool for clinical research. By accurately quantifying vitamin A levels in human serum, this methodology opens avenues for advancing our understanding of vitamin A physiology and its implications for health, particularly in obese populations. In summary, this LC-MS/MS methodology presents a potent tool for clinical studies, providing reliable, specific, and robust detection of vitamin A in human serum, thus, opening a new frontier for advancing our understanding of vitamin A related physiology and health in the obese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.