GuidelineGut and liver2024
Local Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2024 Expert Consensus-Based Practical Recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association.
Guideline in Gut and liver, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of multiple treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and component network meta analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of tumor conspicuity on Kupffer-phase Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography in liver tumors: implications for fusion-guided ablation.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Percutaneous thermal ablation-based locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a 10-year single-center retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- HBx Promotes Liver Cancer Cells to Escape NK-92 Cell Attack by Mediating ADAM10 to Enzyme Cut MICA/B Shedding From Cancer Cell Membrane.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical efficacy of MWA via the caudal‒cranial direction puncture pathway for small hepatocellular carcinoma at the hepatic dome: 3 years of follow-up.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease and recurrence surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma: current evidence and a translational roadmap.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Bibliometrics of artificial intelligence applications in hepatobiliary surgery from 2014 to 2024.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma, a non-surgical option that directly targets and destroys tumor cells, has advanced significantly since the 1990s. Therapies with different energy sources, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, employ different mechanisms to induce tumor necrosis. The precision, safety, and effectiveness of these therapies have increased with advances in guiding technologies and device improvements. Consequently, local ablation has become the first-line treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The lack of organized evidence and expert opinions regarding patient selection, preprocedure preparation, procedural methods, swift post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up has resulted in clinicians following varied practices. Therefore, an expert consensus-based practical recommendation for local ablation was developed by a group of experts in radiology and hepatology from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association in collaboration with the Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation to provide useful information and guidance for performing local ablation and for the pre- and post-treatment management of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.