Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222957›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

A Multi-Institutional Natural Language Processing Pipeline to Extract Performance Status From Electronic Health Records.

Arash Maghsoudi, Yvonne H Sada, Sara Nowakowski, Danielle Guffey, Huili Zhu, Sudha R Yarlagadda, Ang Li, Javad Razjouyan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arash MaghsoudiCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yvonne H SadaCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sara NowakowskiCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Danielle GuffeySection of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3721-614X
Huili ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sudha R YarlagaddaDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ang LiSection of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Javad RazjouyanCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
Using Large Electronic Health Records and Advanced Analytics to Develop Predictive Frailty Trajectories in Patients with Heart FailureK25HL152006 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI RAZJOUYAN, JAVAD · 2020 to 2024
$719k
Using Big-Data to Identify & Prevent Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae within VHAIK2CX001981 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI CHOU, ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001981NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL152006NIH HHS OT2 OD032581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerformance status (PS), an essential indicator of patients' functional abilities, is often documented in clinical notes of patients with cancer. The use of natural language processing (NLP) in extracting PS from electronic medical records (EMRs) has shown promise in enhancing clinical decision-making, patient monitoring, and research studies. We designed and validated a multi-institute NLP pipeline to automatically extract performance status from free-text patient notes. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe collected data from 19,481 patients in Harris Health System (HHS) and 333,862 patients from veteran affair's corporate data warehouse (VA-CDW) and randomly selected 400 patients from each data source to train and validate (50%) and test (50%) the proposed pipeline. We designed an NLP pipeline using an expert-derived rule-based approach in conjunction with extensive post-processing to solidify its proficiency. To demonstrate the pipeline's application, we tested the compliance of PS documentation suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Metric and investigated the potential disparity in PS reporting for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We used a logistic regression test, considering patients in terms of race/ethnicity, conversing language, marital status, and gender.

resultsThe test results on the HHS cohort showed 92% accuracy, and on VA data demonstrated 98.5% accuracy. For stage IV NSCLC patients, the proposed pipeline achieved an accuracy of 98.5%. Furthermore, our analysis revealed a documentation rate of over 85% for PS among NSCLC patients, surpassing the ASCO Quality Metrics. No disparities were observed in the documentation of PS.

conclusionOur proposed NLP pipeline shows promising results in extracting PS from free-text notes from various health institutions. It may be used in longitudinal cancer data registries.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyEastern cooperative oncology groupnatural language processingNon small cell lung cancerperformance statusquality metric

Identifiers

PMID39222957
PMCPMC11369884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.