Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222930›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2024

Organ-specific Biodosimetry Modeling Using Proteomic Biomarkers of Radiation Exposure.

M Sproull, Y Fan, Q Chen, D Meerzaman, K Camphausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M SproullRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Y FanComputational Genomics and Bioinformatics Branch, Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Q ChenComputational Genomics and Bioinformatics Branch, Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
D MeerzamanComputational Genomics and Bioinformatics Branch, Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
K CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

The Synergy Between Radiotherapy and Molecularly Targeted AgentsZIASC010373 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$22.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA SC010373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In future mass casualty medical management scenarios involving radiation injury, medical diagnostics to both identify those who have been exposed and the level of exposure will be needed. As almost all exposures in the field are heterogeneous, determination of degree of exposure and which vital organs have been exposed will be essential for effective medical management. In the current study we sought to characterize novel proteomic biomarkers of radiation exposure and develop exposure and dose prediction algorithms for a variety of exposure paradigms to include uniform total-body exposures, and organ-specific partial-body exposures to only the brain, only the gut and only the lung. C57BL6 female mice received a single total-body irradiation (TBI) of 2, 4 or 8 Gy, 2 and 8 Gy for lung or gut exposures, and 2, 8 or 16 Gy for exposure to only the brain. Plasma was then screened using the SomaScan v4.1 assay for ∼7,000 protein analytes. A subset panel of protein biomarkers demonstrating significant (FDR<0.05 and |logFC|>0.2) changes in expression after radiation exposure was characterized. All proteins were used for feature selection to build 7 different predictive models of radiation exposure using different sample cohort combinations. These models were structured according to practical field considerations to differentiate level of exposure, in addition to identification of organ-specific exposures. Each model algorithm built using a unique sample cohort was validated with a training set of samples and tested with a separate new sample series. The overall predictive accuracy for all models was 100% at the model training level. When tested with reserved samples Model 1 which compared an "exposure" group inclusive of all TBI and organ-specific partial-body exposures in the study vs. control, and Model 2 which differentiated between control, TBI and partials (all organ-specific partial-body exposures) the resulting prediction accuracy was 92.3% and 95.4%, respectively. For identification of organ-specific exposures vs. control, Model 3 (only brain), Model 4 (only gut) and Model 5 (only lung) were developed with predictive accuracies of 78.3%, 88.9% and 94.4%, respectively. Finally, for Models 6 and 7, which differentiated between TBI and separate organ-specific partial-body cohorts, the testing predictive accuracy was 83.1% and 92.3%, respectively. These models represent novel predictive panels of radiation responsive proteomic biomarkers and illustrate the feasibility of development of biodosimetry algorithms with utility for simultaneous classification of total-body, partial-body and organ-specific radiation exposures.

Indexed as

BiomarkersProteomicsRadiation ExposureRadiometryWhole-Body IrradiationAnimalsBrainDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalOrgan SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39222930
PMCPMC11571893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.