Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222928›Full record

Trial reportUltraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)2025

A novel ultrasound-based algorithm for the detection of pancreatic stents placed for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective trial.

Florian Alexander Michael, Clara Feldmann, Hans-Peter Erasmus, Alica Kubesch, Esra Goerguelue, Mate Knabe, Nada Abedin, Myriam Heilani, Daniel Hessz, Christiana Graf and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07346365 (Spontaneous Dislocation and Adverse Events of a Prophylactic Pancreatic Stent), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07346365 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Spontaneous Dislocation and Adverse Events of a Prophylactic Pancreatic Stent: a Prospective, Randomised, Multicenter Study (SAFE PANCREAS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalRan2026 to 2032Enrolled358ConditionsStent Dislodgement, ERCP, Pancreas Stent, Post-ERCP PancreatitisArmspancreatic stent removal, standard group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Florian Alexander MichaelMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-3691
Clara FeldmannMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hans-Peter ErasmusMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alica KubeschMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Esra GoerguelueMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Mate KnabeMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nada AbedinMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Myriam HeilaniMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel HesszMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christiana GrafMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dirk WalterMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fabian FinkelmeierMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulrike MihmMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Neelam LingwalInstitute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stefan ZeuzemMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Joerg BojungaMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Mireen Friedrich-RustMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Georg DultzMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before removal of retained pancreatic stents placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to avoid post-ERCP pancreatitis, imaging is recommended. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new ultrasound-based algorithm.Patients who received a pancreatic stent for PEP prophylaxis were included. Straight 5Fr (0.035inch) 6cm stents with an external flap that were visualized by ultrasound were removed endoscopically with no further imaging. If the ultrasound result reported the stent to be dislodged or was inconclusive, X-ray imaging was performed. The endpoints were positive and negative predictive value, specificity, sensitivity, and contingency coefficient between ultrasound and X-ray and/or endoscopy.88 patients were enrolled in the present study. X-ray was performed in 23 (26%) patients. Accordingly, the ultrasound algorithm saved an X-ray examination in 65 cases, leading to a reduction of 74%. Stents were retained in 67 patients (76%) and visualized correctly by ultrasound in 54 patients with a sensitivity of 81%. The positive predictive value was 83%. The specificity was 48%, because ultrasound described 10/21 dislodged stents correctly. The negative predictive value was 43%, since 10/23 stents were correctly classified by ultrasound as dislodged. In 11 patients (13%), esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed even though the pancreatic stent was already dislodged.A novel ultrasound-based algorithm reduced the need for X-ray imaging by three quarters. To avoid unnecessary endoscopic examinations, the algorithm should be implemented with a learning phase and procedures should be performed by experienced examiners. An important limitation might be stent length since shorter stents might be more difficult to visualize by ultrasound.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatic DuctsPancreatitisPostoperative ComplicationsStentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDevice RemovalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID39222928
PMCPMC11964603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.