ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2024
Differences in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Severity and Its Outcomes Between Black and White Patients.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The MAGIC composite response: a novel end point integrating clinical and biomarker parameters for acute GVHD.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Prediction and Prognostication of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by MAGIC Biomarkers.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Although recent advancements in GVHD prophylaxis have resulted in successful HCT across HLA barriers and expanded access to HCT for racial minorities, less is known about how race affects the severity and outcomes of acute GVHD. This study examines differences in the clinical course of acute GVHD and the prognostic value of GVHD biomarkers for Black and White recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) database who underwent HCT between 2014 and 2021 to describe the difference in clinical course of acute GVHD and significance of GVHD biomarkers between Black and White recipients. We used propensity score matching to generate a 1:3 matched cohort of 234 Black patients and 702 White patients with similar baseline characteristics. In the first year after HCT Black patients experienced a higher cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (17% versus 12%, P = 0.050), higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 18% versus 12%, P = .009), and lower overall survival that trended toward statistical significance (73% versus 79%, P = .071) compared to White patients. The difference in NRM in the first year was even greater among Black patients who developed GVHD than White patients (24% versus 14%, P = .041). The distribution of low, intermediate, and high MAGIC biomarker scores at the time of treatment was similar across racial groups (P = .847), however, Black patients with high biomarker scores experienced significantly worse NRM than White patients (71% versus 32%, P = .010). Our data indicate that Black patients are at a higher risk of NRM following HCT, primarily from a higher incidence of severe GVHD. Serum biomarkers at treatment initiation can stratify patients for risk of NRM across races, however Black patients with high biomarker scores had a significantly greater NRM risk. These results suggest a need for strategies that mitigate the higher risk for poor GVHD outcomes among Black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.