ArticleActa cytologica2024
Adequacy Assessment in Lymph Node Aspirates: An Exploratory Cytomorphologic Analysis of Negative Cervical Node Aspirates of Head and Neck Carcinomas.
Article in Acta cytologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph node is sensitive for detection of metastatic carcinoma but not without a significant false-negative rate. This study reviews clinicocytological features of negative node aspirates to identify predictive factors for establishing adequacy criteria.
methodsNegative FNAC specimens matched with neck dissection from a primary diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell, or undifferentiated (nasopharyngeal) carcinoma were reviewed for clinical and cytological parameters including lymphoid, inflammatory, and background components.
resultsSlides from 86 lymph node aspirates including 50 positive for metastasis on follow-up were retrieved. Higher total lymphocyte count, lymphoid fragment count, germinal center fragment count, undifferentiated histology, presence of histiocytes and absence of blood were associated with a true negative cytologic diagnosis (p < 0.05), but not node size or location (p > 0.05). Undifferentiated histology, small lymphoid and germinal center fragments were independent factors indicative of a true negative diagnosis (p < 0.05). Large lymphoid fragments (p = 0.052) demonstrated a trend. Assessment of lymphoid components over five hotspots high-power fields (HPFs) was more robust in predictive value than only one hotspot. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified >10 small lymphoid, >20 large lymphoid and >2 germinal center fragment per five HPFs as optimal adequacy thresholds. Stricter total lymphocyte count cutoff accompanies increase of diagnostic accuracy, up to 0.67 for ≥5 HPFs with >500 lymphocytes.
conclusionTotal counts of lymphoid and germinal center fragments from multiple HPFs are useful in adequacy assessment of lymph node aspirates and improve diagnostic performance of FNAC in exclusion of metastatic carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.