ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
An objective diagnosis of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease with machine learning of Raman spectra acquired in a point-of-care setting.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Integrated Analysis of Non-Blood Biological Fluids: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Decision-Support Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Status, challenges, and prospects of artificial intelligence application in gout diagnosis and treatment, drug research and development, and disease monitoring.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRaman spectroscopy is proposed as a next-generation method for the identification of monosodium urate (MSU) and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals in synovial fluid. As the interpretation of Raman spectra requires specific expertise, the method is not directly applicable for clinicians. We developed an approach to demonstrate that the identification process can be automated with the use of machine learning techniques. The developed system is tested in a point-of-care-setting at our outpatient rheumatology department.
methodsWe collected synovial fluid samples from 446 patients with various rheumatic diseases from three centres. We analysed all samples with our Raman spectroscope and used 246 samples for training and 200 samples for validation. Trained observers classified every Raman spectrum as MSU, CPP or other. We designed two one-against-all classifiers, one for MSU and one for CPP. These classifiers consisted of a principal component analysis model followed by a support vector machine.
resultsThe accuracy for classification of CPP using the 2023 ACR/EULAR CPPD classification criteria was 96.0% (95% CI: 92.3, 98.3), while the accuracy for classification of MSU using the 2015 ACR/EULAR gout classification criteria was 92.5% (95% CI: 87.9, 95.7). Overall, the accuracy for classification of pathological crystals was 88.0% (95% CI: 82.7, 92.2). The model was able to discriminate between pathological crystals, artifacts and other particles such as microplastics.
conclusionWe here demonstrate that potentially complex Raman spectra from clinical patient samples can be successfully classified by a machine learning approach, resulting in an objective diagnosis independent of the opinion of the medical examiner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.