Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222391›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2024

Impact of mechanical bowel preparation on the gut microbiome of patients undergoing left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: randomized clinical trial.

Kristina Žukauskaitė, Angela Horvath, Žilvinas Gricius, Mindaugas Kvietkauskas, Bernardas Baušys, Audrius Dulskas, Justas Kuliavas, Rimantas Baušys, Simona Rūta Letautienė, Ieva Vaicekauskaitė and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04013841 (Bowel Preparation for Left Side Colon Surgery Impact on the Intestinal Microbiome), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04013841 nacompletednot on this map

Bowel Preparation for Left Side Colon Surgery Impact on the Intestinal Microbiome: Oral Preparation vs Enema

TypeinterventionalSponsorVilnius UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsOral-agents/Enema
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulation of the gut microbiota as a novel strategy to prevent anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: Systematic scoping review.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kristina ŽukauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Angela HorvathDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Žilvinas GriciusClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Mindaugas KvietkauskasClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Bernardas BaušysClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Audrius DulskasClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-8962
Justas KuliavasClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rimantas BaušysNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Simona Rūta LetautienėNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ieva VaicekauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rasa SabaliauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Augustinas BaušysInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Vanessa StadlbauerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sonata JarmalaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

LMTLT S-PD-24-87)Research Council of Lithuania
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery have been linked to the gut microbiome. However, the impact of mechanical bowel preparation using oral preparation agents or rectal enema on postoperative infections remains poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the impact of oral preparation and rectal enema on the gut microbiome and postoperative complications.

methodsThis open-label pilot RCT was conducted at the National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania. Patients with left-side colorectal cancer scheduled for elective resection with primary anastomosis were randomized 1 : 1 to preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with either oral preparation or rectal enema. Stool samples were collected before surgery, and on postoperative day 6 and 30 for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. The primary outcome was difference in β-diversity between groups on postoperative day 6.

resultsForty participants were randomized to oral preparation (20) or rectal enema (20). The two groups had similar changes in microbiome composition, and there was no difference in β-diversity on postoperative day 6. Postoperative infections occurred in 12 patients (32%), without differences between the study groups. Patients with infections had an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species.

conclusionMechanical bowel preparation with oral preparation or rectal enema resulted in similar dysbiosis. Patients who experienced postoperative infections exhibited distinct gut microbiome compositions on postoperative day 6, characterized by an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04013841 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

CatharticsColorectal NeoplasmsEnemaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareCathartics

Identifiers

PMID39222391
PMCPMC11368128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.