Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222377›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2024

Explainable machine learning prediction of edema adverse events in patients treated with tepotinib.

Federico Amato, Rainer Strotmann, Roberto Castello, Rolf Bruns, Vishal Ghori, Andreas Johne, Karin Berghoff, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Nadia Terranova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico AmatoSwiss Data Science Center (EPFL and ETH Zurich), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rainer StrotmannThe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Roberto CastelloSwiss Data Science Center (EPFL and ETH Zurich), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rolf BrunsThe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Vishal GhoriAres Trading S.A., Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Andreas JohneThe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-2857
Karin BerghoffThe healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Karthik VenkatakrishnanEMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
Nadia TerranovaQuantitative Pharmacology, Ares Trading S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0033-3695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tepotinib is approved for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. While edema is the most prevalent adverse event (AE) and a known class effect of MET inhibitors including tepotinib, there is still limited understanding about the factors contributing to its occurrence. Herein, we apply machine learning (ML)-based approaches to predict the likelihood of occurrence of edema in patients undergoing tepotinib treatment, and to identify factors influencing its development over time. Data from 612 patients receiving tepotinib in five Phase I/II studies were modeled with two ML algorithms, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Trees, to predict edema AE incidence and severity. Probability calibration was applied to give a realistic estimation of the likelihood of edema AE. Best model was tested on follow-up data and on data from clinical studies unused while training. Results showed high performances across all the tested settings, with F1 scores up to 0.961 when retraining the model with the most relevant covariates. The use of ML explainability methods identified serum albumin as the most informative longitudinal covariate, and higher age as associated with higher probabilities of more severe edema. The developed methodological framework enables the use of ML algorithms for analyzing clinical safety data and exploiting longitudinal information through various covariate engineering approaches. Probability calibration ensures the accurate estimation of the likelihood of the AE occurrence, while explainability tools can identify factors contributing to model predictions, hence supporting population and individual patient-level interpretation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEdemaMachine LearningAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazinesAntineoplastic AgentsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazinesPyrimidinestepotinib

Identifiers

PMID39222377
PMCPMC11368086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.