Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222341›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Occupational Exposure to Silica Dust and Silicosis Risk in Chinese Noncoal Mines: Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment.

Kai Liu, Xin Sun, Wei-Jiang Hu, Liang-Ying Mei, Heng-Dong Zhang, Shi-Biao Su, Kang Ning, Yun-Feng Nie, Le-Ping Qiu, Ying Xia and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Kai LiuNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6452-9980
Xin SunNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-0012
Wei-Jiang HuNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0740-9434
Liang-Ying MeiInstitute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9390-9190
Heng-Dong ZhangInstitute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-1289-060X
Shi-Biao SuInstitute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-7492
Kang NingInstitute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9047-5749
Yun-Feng NieDepartment of Health Risk Assessment, Hunan Prevention and Treatment Institute for Occupational Diseases, Changsha, China.ORCID 0009-0006-1432-688X
Le-Ping QiuInstitute of Occupational Health and Radiological Health, Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7737-5134
Ying XiaInstitute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7235-2627
Lei HanInstitute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8176-4912
Qiang ZhiDepartment of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.ORCID 0009-0004-3559-9305
Chun-Bo ShiInstitute of Occupational Health and Public Health, Qinghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xining, China.ORCID 0009-0007-4637-9617
Geng WangInstitute of Occupational Health and Public Health, Qinghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xining, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3338-7765
Wei WenInstitute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3567-9426
Jian-Qiong GaoDepartment of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.ORCID 0009-0004-6623-7737
Bing YuEnshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefectural Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Enshi, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2159-992X
Xin WangNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-0484
Yi-Wen DongNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2561-0399
Ning KangNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-0681-7110
Feng HanNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7527-1660
Hong-Ying BianNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-3993
Yong-Qing ChenNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-0020-7127
Meng YeNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2007-4918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing awareness, silica dust-induced silicosis still contributes to the huge disease burden in China. Worryingly, recent silica dust exposure levels and silicosis risk in Chinese noncoal mines remain unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to determine recent silica dust exposure levels and assess the risk of silicosis in Chinese noncoal mines.

methodsBetween May and December 2020, we conducted a retrospective cohort study on 3 noncoal mines and 1 public hospital to establish, using multivariable Cox regression analyses, prediction formulas of the silicosis cumulative hazard ratio (H) and incidence (I) and a cross-sectional study on 155 noncoal mines in 10 Chinese provinces to determine the prevalence of silica dust exposure (PDE), free silica content, and total dust and respirable dust concentrations. The qualitative risk of silicosis was assessed using the International Mining and Metals Commission's risk-rating table and the occupational hazard risk index; the quantitative risk was assessed using prediction formulas.

resultsKaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in the silicosis probability between silica dust-exposed male and female miners (log-rank test χ21=7.52, P=.01). A total of 126 noncoal mines, with 29,835 miners and 4623 dust samples, were included; 13,037 (43.7%) miners were exposed to silica dust, of which 12,952 (99.3%) were male. The median PDE, free silica content, total dust concentration, and respirable dust concentration were 61.6%, 27.6%, 1.30 mg/m3, and 0.58 mg/m3, respectively, indicating that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines suffer high-level exposure to silica dust. Comprehensive qualitative risk assessment showed noncoal miners had a medium risk of silicosis, and the risks caused by total silica dust and respirable silica dust exposure were high and medium, respectively. When predicting H and I over the next 10, 20, and 30 years, we assumed that the miner gender was male. Under exposure to current total silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 25.1%, and 49.9%, respectively. Under exposure to current respirable silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 27.7%, and 57.4%, respectively. These findings showed that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines have a higher I and higher qualitative silicosis risk.

conclusionsChinese noncoal miners, especially those in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines, still suffer high-level exposure to silica dust and a medium-level risk of silicosis. Data of both total silica dust and respirable silica dust are vital for occupational health risk assessment in order to devise effective control measures to reduce noncoal mine silica dust levels, improve miners' working environment, and reduce the risk of silicosis.

Indexed as

DustMiningOccupational ExposureSilicon DioxideSilicosisAdultChinaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentDustSilicon DioxideChinese noncoal minequalitative and quantitative risk assessmentqualitative risk assessmentquantitative risk assessmentsilica dustsilicosis

Identifiers

PMID39222341
PMCPMC11406111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.