Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222329›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2024

Teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis: uncovering novel insights into efficacy and safety compared to other treatments - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Anko Elijah Essien, Masoud Rahmati, Michael Opoku, Dong Keon Yon, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Ai Koyanagi, Lee Smith, Jae Il Shin, Wenfeng Xiao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Djandan Tadum Arthur VithranDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-7266
Anko Elijah EssienDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Masoud RahmatiResearch Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Michael OpokuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Dong Keon YonCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Guillermo F López SánchezDivision of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ai KoyanagiResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Jae Il ShinDepartment of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wenfeng XiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shuguang LiuDepartment of Joint Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yusheng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teriparatide compared to other treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: A review of studies from 2000 to January 2023 analyzed randomized controlled trials on postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide (PTH 1-34), comparing it to placebo or other osteoporosis treatments. The analysis focused on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and clinical outcomes, employing Review Manager 5.4.1 and the RoB 2 tool for bias assessment. Results: Our analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that PTH (134) treatment significantly increased lumbar spine BMD (mean difference (MD) = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03) and femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.01). However, there were no significant changes in total hip and radial bone BMD among the 3536 and 2046 participants, respectively. We also found that PTH (1-34) increased P1NP in a larger cohort (n = 1415) when compared to osteocalcin (n = 206). Although the risk of adverse events increased (relative risk (RR) = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.32-2.07), the incidence of fractures decreased significantly (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45-0.072), with no significant difference observed in mortality rates between treatment and control groups. Conclusion: Teriparatide improves lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in postmenopausal women. Particularly notable is the novel finding regarding its effect on radius BMD, an area less explored in previous research. Despite an uptick in adverse events, the marked decrease in fracture incidence confirms its clinical utility for high-risk osteoporosis patients, highlighting the necessity for ongoing investigations into its full skeletal effects.

Indexed as

fracturesparathyroid hormonepostmenopausal osteoporosissystematic reviewteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID39222329
PMCPMC11457814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.