Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222269›Full record

SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2024

Binocular treatment for amblyopia: a systematic review.

Zoi Tsani, Dimitrios Ioannopoulos, Sofia Androudi, Efthimios Dardiotis, Eleni Papageorgiou

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoi TsaniOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece. zoi.tsani@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-8683
Dimitrios IoannopoulosAnaesthesiology Department, General State Hospital of Nikaia-Piraeus "St. Panteleimon", Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9016-1569
Sofia AndroudiOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-7793
Efthimios DardiotisNeurology Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-641X
Eleni PapageorgiouOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1931-4168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment of unilateral amblyopia involves refractive adaptation, occlusion therapy or penalization with atropine drops. However, in recent years, the use of binocular digital therapy has shown promising results. Aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of binocular treatment of amblyopia compared with standard treatments or placebo therapy.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA statement. Electronic literature was thoroughly searched for articles published between 2013 and May 2024, in the following electronic database; Pubmed, CENTRAL, MedlinePlus, Medline Europe, PLOS, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov. The review comprised randomized control trials (RCTs) including patients with unilateral amblyopia, who received binocular therapy or standard amblyopia or placebo treatment for more than two weeks and who had visual acuity assessment pre- and post-treatment. Only articles written in English were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Rob2 tool, while study quality was evaluated with the modified Jadad scale.

resultsTwenty RCTs, including 1769 patients, were incorporated into this systematic review. Twelve different types of binocular amblyopia treatments were identified and categorized into two main types. The first type involves the presentation of low-contrast images in the fellow eye, including stimuli presented only in the amblyopic eye. The second type combines this approach with complementary dichoptic deficits in the images presented to both eyes to encourage their simultaneous use.

conclusionBinocular amblyopia treatment has shown promising results in addressing unilateral anisometropic, strabismic or mixed type of amblyopia. Nevertheless, further randomized controlled trials are essential to establish the exact dosage, type and duration of binocular therapy as a standard component of amblyopia care.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVision, BinocularHumansSensory DeprivationVisual AcuityAmblyopiaBinocular therapyBinocular treatmentDichoptic treatmentLazy eye

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.