Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222234›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2024

Comparison of disease and risk classifications of AML before and after incorporation of NGS analysis of bone marrow samples.

Hiroyuki Sugiura, Tatsunori Ishikawa, Taiga Kuroi, Sachiyo Okamoto, Naho Nomura, Taro Masunari, Nobuo Sezaki, Seishi Ogawa, Yasuhito Nannya, Masanori Makita

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiroyuki SugiuraDivision of Internal Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan. hiroyuki.sugiura0715@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2400-0086
Tatsunori IshikawaDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Taiga KuroiDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Sachiyo OkamotoDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Naho NomuraDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Taro MasunariDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Nobuo SezakiDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.
Seishi OgawaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhito NannyaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanori MakitaDepartment of Hematology, Chugoku Central Hospital of Japan Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuyama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been incorporated into the new disease classification (International Consensus Classification; ICC) and risk classification (European LeukemiaNet [ELN] 2022; ELN2022). We compared disease subtypes between the previous disease classification (4th edition of the WHO classification; WHO-4) and the ICC in 91 patients with AML diagnosed at our institution. We also compared disease risk classifications using the previous risk classification (ELN2017) and the ELN2022. Targeted sequencing of bone marrow samples was conducted at Kyoto University. We found that entities under AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities were well-established, with almost no change from the WHO-4 to the ICC. In contrast, 16.7% of cases of AML, not otherwise specified in the WHO-4 were reclassified into AML with mutated TP53, and 36.7% were reclassified into AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities per the ICC. Meanwhile, the ELN2017 and ELN2022 showed no difference in concordance indexes in multivariate Cox regression analysis for progression-free and overall survival. The superiority of the ELN2022 over the ELN2017 could not be confirmed in our single-center retrospective study, and further investigation including multicenter prospective studies is needed.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentYoung AdultAcute myeloid leukemiaInternational consensus classificationNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.