ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2024
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy of Food Allergy.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Allergology: Epitope Discovery and Its Application for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy of Food Allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhile there are compelling arguments for developing subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy for alleviation of food allergies, there is a limited number of studies in the public domain. The review seeks to present the approaches taken, to explain the paucity of studies, and to identify new roads for development. RECENT
findingsA literature search revealed clinical trials of immunotherapy of food allergies to fish and peanut, but studies had limited patient numbers, short treatment courses and follow-up periods. Indications, but no clearcut effects, were seen with both classical allergen extracts and hypo-allergenic preparations. A special case is the influence on cross-reactive food allergies, when subcutaneously administered birch-pollen extracts are used for treatment of birch pollen hayfever and/or asthma. Again indications, but no convincing efficacy has been registered. Newer developments include recombinant hypoallergens and DNA-technologies. Subcutaneous immunotherapy for food allergies has not matured to provide clinically relevant treatment opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39222196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.