ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
Development of Extubation Success Prediction Model for Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH) patients have a low success rate in extubation, but there are currently no guidelines establishing specifically for SCH patients extubation. The study included 68 SCH patients who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h, with 39 cases (57.3%) resulting in successful extubation. The multivariate analysis identified four factors significantly associated with extubation success: patient age under 66 years, an Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) score less than 4 points, the presence of tissue shift, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (excluding language) above 6 points at extubation. By simplifying the prediction model, we obtained the Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage Extubation Success scoring system (SCHES-SCORE). Within the scoring system, 2 points were allocated for a GCS score (excluding language) above 6 at extubation, 1 point each for age under 66 years and an ICH score below 4, while tissue shift was assigned a negative point. A score of Grade A (SCHES-SCORE = 3-4) was found to correlate with a 92.9% success rate for extubation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.923 (95% CI, 0.863 to 0.983). Notably, successful extubation was significantly linked to reduced durations of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and total hospital stay. In conclusion, the scoring system developed for assessing extubation outcomes in SCH patients has the potential to enhance the rate of successful extubation and overall patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39222195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.