Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222093›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2024

[Retrospective analysis of the resuscitation room management of nontraumatic critically ill children in a university emergency department (OBSERvE-DUS-PED study)].

Claudia Priebe, Hans Martin Bosse, Mark Michael, Olaf Picker, Michael Bernhard, Juliane Tautz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia PriebeKlinik für Allgemeine Pädiatrie, Kinderkardiologie und Neonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Deutschland.
Hans Martin BosseKlinik für Allgemeine Pädiatrie, Kinderkardiologie und Neonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Deutschland.
Mark MichaelZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Olaf PickerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Michael BernhardZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Michael.Bernhard@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Juliane TautzKlinik für Allgemeine Pädiatrie, Kinderkardiologie und Neonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe establishment of a resuscitation room management for nontraumatic critically ill children appears to make sense. This study collected data of pediatric patients suffering from nontraumatic critically ill conditions treated in a resuscitation room.

methodsThe retrospective OBSERvE-DUS-PED study (November 2019-October 2022) recorded pediatric patients (age < 18 years) who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) for resuscitation room care. The routinely documented data on treatment were taken from the hospital information system MEDICO® and the patient data management system COPRA® in accordance with the OBSERvE dataset. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University (2023-2377).

resultsThe study included 52 pediatric resuscitation room patients. Adolescents aged 14-17 years were the most frequent in the cohort representing 37% of the total and neonates/infants (0-1 year) were lowest at 8%. The most common symptoms categorized according to ABCDE problems were disturbance of consciousness (D) at 61%, cardiovascular failure (C) at 25%, respiratory insufficiency (B) at 6%, airway obstruction (A) and exposure/environment (E) problems each at 4%. The out-of-hospital and in-hospital emergency procedures were performed with the following frequencies: venous (58% vs. 65%), intraosseous (14% vs. 2%) and central venous access (0% vs. 12%), invasive airway management (35% vs. 8%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (21% vs. 10%), vasopressors (15% vs. 17%), and intra-arterial pressure measurement (0% vs. 17%). The mean duration of resuscitation room management was 70 ± 43 min. The 30-day mortality was 17%.

conclusionThe OBSERvE-DUS-PED study demonstrates the major challenges in the care of critically ill nontraumatic pediatric patients, both in out-of-hospital and in-hospital management. The variety and complexity of the referral diagnoses as well as the immediate vital threat to the patients make it appear sensible to treat such patients primarily in a resuscitation room of the ED due to the available material, infrastructural and personnel resources.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEmergency Service, HospitalResuscitationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesCare conceptCritically ill patientsEmergency departmentPediatric emergencyResuscitation room

Identifiers

PMID39222093
PMCPMC11447138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.