ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2024
Tracking induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation with a fluorescent genetically encoded epigenetic probe.
Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time and Spatially Resolved Epigenetic Dynamics Tracking Beyond DNA Methylation via Live-Cell Epigenetic Sensors in 3D Systems.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven nano-enhanced stem cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: from rational design to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Live monitoring uncovers divergent epigenetic remodeling during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Generation of hTERT-immortalized human mesenchymal stromal cells with optical and magnetic labels for in vivo transplantation and tracking.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Cellular mechanical memory: a potential tool for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications (methylation, acetylation, etc.) of core histones play a key role in regulation of gene expression. Thus, the epigenome changes strongly during various biological processes such as cell differentiation and dedifferentiation. Classical methods of analysis of epigenetic modifications such as mass-spectrometry and chromatin immuno-precipitation, work with fixed cells only. Here we present a genetically encoded fluorescent probe, MPP8-Green, for detecting H3K9me3, a histone modification associated with inactive chromatin. This probe, based on the chromodomain of MPP8, allows for visualization of H3K9me3 epigenetic landscapes in single living cells. We used this probe to track changes in H3K9me3 landscapes during the differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into induced neurons. Our findings revealed two major waves of global H3K9me3 reorganization during 4-day differentiation, namely on the first and third days, whereas nearly no changes occurred on the second and fourth days. The proposed method LiveMIEL (Live-cell Microscopic Imaging of Epigenetic Landscapes), which combines genetically encoded epigenetic probes and machine learning approaches, enables classification of multiparametric epigenetic signatures of single cells during stem cell differentiation and potentially in other biological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.