Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39222081›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

The more the better? Integration of vertebral pelvic angles (VPA) PJK thresholds to existing alignment schemas for prevention of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery.

Ankita Das, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Jamshaid Mir, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage, Peter G Passias

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ankita DasDepartment of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Spine Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, 27710-4000, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-7524
Oluwatobi O OnafowokanDepartment of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Spine Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, 27710-4000, Durham, NC, USA.
Jamshaid MirDepartment of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Spine Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, 27710-4000, Durham, NC, USA.
Renaud LafageDepartment of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Virginie LafageDepartment of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Peter G PassiasDepartment of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Spine Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, 27710-4000, Durham, NC, USA. pgpassias@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-4070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile existing adult spinal deformity (ASD) alignment schemas acknowledge the dynamic relationship between the pelvis and spine, consideration of vertebral pelvic angles (VPA) thresholds for PJK may provide further insight into the relationship of each individual vertebra to the pelvis, which may allow for greater individualization of operative targets. Herein, we examine VPA's utility in preventing mechanical complications and its possible unification with prevalent scoring systems.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected database, operative ASD patients ≥ 18 years with complete baseline (BL) and two-year (Y) operative, radiographic, and health-related quality of life data were included. Descriptive analyses, means comparison, and logistic regression tests were applied to explore demographic and surgical differences, as well as the impact of alignment goals on outcomes. Cohorts were grouped as patients who met VPA non-PJK thresholds, as defined by Duvvuri et al. 2023 alone versus traditional GAP/SAAS alignment matching versus combined VPA + SAAS + GAP. The Non-PJK VPA validated mean for L1PA was 10.4 ± 7.0 and T9PA 8.9 ± 7.5.

results398 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 61 ± 14 years, 78% female, BL BMI 27 ± 6, BL CCI 2 ± 2). At baseline, mean vertebral pelvic angles were as follows: T1PA: 24 ± 14; T4PA 20 ± 13, T9PA 15 ± 12, L1PA 11 ± 10, L4PA 11 ± 6. Mean vertebral pelvic angles at 6 W postoperatively: T1PA 16 ± 10, T4PA 12 ± 10, T9PA 8 ± 9, L1PA 9 ± 8, L4PA 11 ± 5. 240 (60%) patients attained optimal L1PA, while 104 patients (26.1%) reached non-PJK mean for T9PA. 89 patients (22%) were optimal by both VPA standards. VPA-Optimal group demonstrated significantly lower rates of 1Y PJK (17% v 83%, p = 0.042) and PJF by 2Y (7% v. 93%, p = 0.038). When patients attained VPA goals in addition to GAP/SAAS goals at 6 W, they demonstrated significantly lower rates of Y1 PJK (p = 0.026) and Y1 and Y2 PJF. Those with optimal VPA registered greater SRS-22 scores across multiple domains (p < 0.02) as well as a greater rate of normal neurological examination at 6 W (p = 0.048).

conclusionsVertebral pelvic angles are a reliable measure of global alignment, and respecting certain targets may help prevent development of PJK/PJF. The value of VPA can be augmented through integration with GAP/SAAS frameworks to prevent complications and improve quality of life.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvisRetrospective StudiesSpinal CurvaturesSpineAlignmentDeformitySagittalSpine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.