Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221906›Full record

ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2024

Therapists' defense use impacts their patients' defensive functioning: a systematic case study.

Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Vera Békés, Bernard S Gorman, Karl Stukenberg, Sherwood Waldron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariagrazia Di GiuseppeDepartment of History, Humanities, and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata. mariagrazia.di.giuseppe@uniroma2.it.
Katie Aafjes-van DoornFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA; Faculty of Arts and Sciences, New York University Shanghai. katie.aafjes@yu.edu.
Vera BékésFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY. vera.bekes@yu.edu.
Bernard S GormanDepartment of Psychology, Hofstra University, New York, NY; Psychoanalytic Research Consortium, New York, NY; Derner Institute, Adelphi University, New York, NY. bernard.gorman@emeritus.ncc.edu.
Karl StukenbergPsychoanalytic Research Consortium, New York, NY; School of Psychology, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH. stukenb@xavier.edu.
Sherwood WaldronPsychoanalytic Research Consortium, New York, NY. woodywald@earthlink.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research into defensive functioning in psychotherapy has thus far focused on patients' defense use. However, also the defensive functioning of therapists might be significant because of its potential in promoting changes in the patient's overall defensive functioning by sharing their higher-level understanding of a given situation and letting the patient have the opportunity to learn how to cope more successfully. This exploratory case study is the first to examine therapist's defense mechanisms and their relationship to changes in the patient's defensive functioning evaluated at different times throughout psychoanalytic treatment. We assessed the use of defense mechanisms with the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales in 20 sessions collected at three phases (early, middle and late) of the psychoanalytic treatment. For each session, we identified therapist's and patient's defenses, defense levels and overall defensive functioning, with particular attention to the sequence of consecutively activated defenses within the therapeutic dyad. Results showed that the patient's defensive functioning tended to gradually improve over the course of the treatment, with a slight decrease at the end. Therapists' overall defensive functioning remained stable throughout the treatment with values in the range of high-neurotic and mature defenses. Assessment of the dyadic interaction between therapist and patient's use of defenses showed that within-session, the patient tended to use the same individual defenses that the therapist used, which was especially pronounced in the initial phases of the treatment. Towards the end of the treatment, once there was a stable shared knowledge, the patient started to explore using new, higher-level defenses on her own, independent from what defenses the therapist used. Our findings emphasized the analyst's role in encouraging the development of more effective ways of coping in the patient, confirming previous theoretical and empirical research regarding the improvement of patient's defensive functioning in psychotherapy. The alterations in these coping strategies, also called high-adaptive defenses, as part of the therapist-patient interaction demonstrate the importance of studying defenses as an excellent process-based outcome measure. The measurement of the degree to which the analyst models and illustrates these superior coping methods to the patient is a prime vehicle for supporting internalization of these skills by the patient.

Identifiers

PMID39221906
PMCPMC11417673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.