ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2025
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Risk Stratification of Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction Using Electrocardiographic Images.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction in patients with cancer and cancer survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Merging artificial intelligence into cancer nursing care: Current applications, challenges, and opportunities.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Machine learning-enhanced baseline risk prediction models for cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and critical appraisal of methodological quality.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Care in Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Review and Integrated Systems-Based Approach from a UK Cardio-Oncology Centre of Excellence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and the evolution of the electrocardiogram: from cardiovascular diagnostic tool to digital biomarker.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- From Cardioprotection to Trial Design: Rethinking Cardiac Safety in Oncology.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor cardiotoxicity using machine learning: a systematic review of model performance and methodological quality.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- From data to decision: a clinical pipeline for wearable AI in early cardiotoxicity detection.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and the Expanding Universe of Cardio-Oncology: Beyond Detection Toward Prediction and Prevention of Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity-A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical advances and challenges of antibody-mediated targeted drug delivery in breast cancer therapeutics.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Toward Personalized CTRCD Risk Prediction: CHECK HEART Offers a Preliminary Framework.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Signaling pathways and potential therapeutic agents in trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arrhythmias: clinical challenges, artificial intelligence-enhanced monitoring, and management strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal fusion of EHR and ECG based on deep learning for predicting new-onset coronary heart disease in cancer patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardio-oncology: decoding mechanisms, predicting toxicity, and personalizing cancer therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated Model for Predicting Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for the Detection and Management of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisk stratification strategies for cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) rely on serial monitoring by specialized imaging, limiting their scalability. We aimed to examine an application of artificial intelligence (AI) to ECG images as a surrogate for imaging risk biomarkers and its association with early CTRCD.
methodsAcross a US-based health system (2013-2023), we identified 1550 patients (aged, 60 [interquartile range, 51-69] years, 1223 [78.9%] women) without cardiomyopathy who received anthracyclines or trastuzumab for breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and had ECG performed ≤12 months before treatment. We deployed a validated AI model of left ventricular systolic dysfunction to baseline ECG images and defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities of <0.01, 0.01 to 0.1, and ≥0.1 (positive screen), respectively. We explored the association with early CTRCD (new cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%), or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, up to 12 months after treatment. In a mechanistic analysis, we assessed the association between global longitudinal strain and AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities in studies performed within 15 days of each other.
resultsAmong 1550 patients without known cardiomyopathy (median follow-up, 14.1 [interquartile range, 13.4-17.1] months), 83 (5.4%), 562 (36.3%), and 905 (58.4%) were classified as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively, by baseline AI-ECG. A high-risk versus low-risk AI-ECG screen (≥0.1 versus <0.01) was associated with a 3.4-fold and 13.5-fold higher incidence of CTRCD (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.35 [95% CI, 2.25-4.99]) and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (adjusted hazard ratio, 13.52 [95% CI, 5.06-36.10]), respectively. Post hoc analyses supported longitudinal increases in AI-ECG probabilities within 6 to 12 months of a CTRCD event. Among 1428 temporally linked echocardiograms and ECGs, AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities were associated with worse global longitudinal strain (global longitudinal strain, -19% [interquartile range, -21% to -17%] for probabilities <0.1, to -15% [interquartile range, -15% to -9%] for ≥0.5 [
conclusionsAI applied to baseline ECG images can stratify the risk of early CTRCD associated with anthracycline or trastuzumab exposure in the setting of breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.