ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Automated MRI-based segmentation of intracranial arterial calcification by restricting feature complexity.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop an automated deep learning model for MRI-based segmentation and detection of intracranial arterial calcification.
methodsA novel deep learning model under the variational autoencoder framework was developed. A theoretically grounded dissimilarity loss was proposed to refine network features extracted from MRI and restrict their complexity, enabling the model to learn more generalizable MR features that enhance segmentation accuracy and robustness for detecting calcification on MRI.
resultsThe proposed method was compared with nine baseline methods on a dataset of 113 subjects and showed superior performance (for segmentation, Dice similarity coefficient: 0.620, area under precision-recall curve [PR-AUC]: 0.660, 95% Hausdorff Distance: 0.848 mm, Average Symmetric Surface Distance: 0.692 mm; for slice-wise detection, F1 score: 0.823, recall: 0.764, precision: 0.892, PR-AUC: 0.853). For clinical needs, statistical tests confirmed agreement between the true calcification volumes and predicted values using the proposed approach. Various MR sequences, namely T1, time-of-flight, and SNAP, were assessed as inputs to the model, and SNAP provided unique and essential information pertaining to calcification structures.
conclusionThe proposed deep learning model with a dissimilarity loss to reduce feature complexity effectively improves MRI-based identification of intracranial arterial calcification. It could help establish a more comprehensive and powerful pipeline for vascular image analysis on MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.