ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
A machine learning model for early and accurate prediction of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation before its progression to an overt stage.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Cross-algorithm machine learning and consensus features for early disseminated intravascular coagulation risk prediction in sepsis-induced coagulopathy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical thrombosis and hemostasis: A review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation: cause, molecular mechanism, diagnosis, and therapy.MedComm · 2025Review
- Developing a molecular diagnostic model for heatstroke-induced coagulopathy: a proteomics and metabolomics approach.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- The transition of the criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation and the targeted patients in randomized controlled trials over the decades: a scoping review.Thrombosis journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent studies suggested an expected survival benefit associated with anticoagulant therapies for sepsis in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, anticoagulant therapies for overt DIC are no longer assumed to regulate pathologic progression as overt DIC is a late-phase coagulation disorder. Therefore, methods for early prediction of sepsis-induced DIC before its progression to an overt stage are strongly required. Objectives: We aimed to develop a prediction model for overt DIC using machine learning. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included adult septic patients without overt DIC. The objective variable was binary classification of whether patients developed overt DIC based on International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) overt DIC criteria. Explanatory variables were the baseline and time series data within 7 days from sepsis diagnosis. Light Gradient Boosted Machine method was used to construct the prediction model. For controls, we assessed sensitivity and specificity of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria for subsequent onset of overt DIC. Results: Among 912 patients with sepsis, 139 patients developed overt DIC within 7 days from diagnosis of sepsis. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting onset of overt DIC within 7 days were 84.4%, 87.5%, and 0.867 in the test cohort and 95.0%, 75.9%, and 0.851 in the validation cohort, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity by the diagnostic thresholds were 54.7% and 74.9% for Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and 63.3% and 71.9% for ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with conventional DIC scoring systems, a machine learning model might exhibit higher prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.