ArticleWellcome open research2024
Injectable antibiotic use in India: public-private share in volume and cost.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Linking access to stewardship: a pathway for introducing reserve antibiotics in India.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Consumption of injectable antibiotics is not widely studied, despite injectables constitute a major share of antibiotic cost. This study aimed to understand the share of oral and injectable antibiotic consumption and cost at the national level in India, and the public and private sector shares in the provision and cost of injectables in Kerala state. Methods: We used the PharmaTrac private sector sales dataset and the Kerala Medical Services Corporation public sector procurement dataset. Using WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classifications, we estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per defined daily dose (DDD), and per-capita spending on injectables. Results: Although 94.9% of total antibiotics consumed at the national level were oral preparations, 35.8% of total spending were on injectables. In Kerala , around 33% of total antibiotic spending in the private sector were for injectables, compared to around 25% in the public sector. The public sector used fewer injectable antibiotic formulations (n=21) compared the private sector (n=69). The cost per DDD was significantly higher in the private sector as compared to the public sector. Despite only accounting for 6.3% of the cost share, the public sector provided 31.4% of injectables, indicating very high efficiency. Across both sectors, Watch group antibiotics were significantly more consumed and at a significantly higher cost than Access group antibiotics, for example in nearly double the quantity and at 1.75 times the price per DDD in the private sector. Reserve group antibiotics made up the lowest consumption share (0.61% in the private sector), but at the highest cost per DDD (over 16 times that of Access). Conclusions: Public sector showed higher cost efficiency in antibiotic provisioning compared to private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use cannot be achieved through drug price control alone but requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.