ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Different Suture Materials for Oral Surgery: An In Vitro Tensile Strength Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering matrix-embedded dual-drug eluting biodegradable surgical sutures for prophylaxis against surgical site infections.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSutures are essential components of wound closure in oral surgery, and the mechanical properties of suture materials play a crucial role in determining surgical outcomes. Understanding the tensile strengths of various suture materials is vital for selecting the most appropriate material for specific clinical applications.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the tensile strength of suture materials commonly used in oral surgery through an in vitro tensile strength study.
methodsA total of 192 samples of six commonly used suture materials (polyglycolic acid (PGA), polyglactin 910 (PGLA), polylactic acid (PLA), polydioxanone (PDO), silk, and nylon) were subjected to tensile strength testing using a universal testing machine. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the tensile strength of each suture material. A comparative analysis was conducted using appropriate statistical tests to identify any significant differences in the tensile strength among the different materials.
resultsSignificant variability in tensile strength was observed among the suture materials in newtons (N). PGLA exhibited the highest mean tensile strength (38.7 N), followed closely by PDO (37.1 N), whereas silk displayed the lowest tensile strength (32.8 N). Comparative analysis revealed significant differences in the tensile strength among the materials (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study provides valuable insights into the mechanical properties of the suture materials commonly used in oral surgery. These findings underscore the importance of considering tensile strength when selecting suture materials for specific clinical scenarios, thereby optimizing wound closure techniques and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.