ArticleCureus2024
Phantom-Enhanced High Mechanical Accuracy for Frame-Based Deep Brain Stimulation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-Assisted versus non-robotic frame-based deep brain stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of targeting accuracy and clinical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that depends on high-accuracy targeting of structures to implant electrodes within the brain. The positioning of these electrodes in the brain determines the long-term efficacy of treating diseases such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, or dystonia. Misplaced electrodes in DBS can lead to poor efficacy and stimulation-induced side effects. Widespread targeting errors and variability have been published throughout the literature. As such, improvement in targeting accuracy is needed to enhance the quality of the procedures. A stereotactic phantom was utilized to test and adjust targeting before the surgical placement in the brain for 91 sequential electrodes. The tip of the microelectrode, the first rigid point in time, was measured and compared to the planned target. The technique utilized a to-target cannula with an XY stage that allowed x-axis and y-axis adjustments and correction for inaccuracies relative to the phantom. A calculation was developed to convert anatomical angles (sagittal and coronal) provided by commercial planning stations to spherical angles to calculate points along a trajectory. Error calculations included each dimensional axis, Euclidean error, and radial error. Bends in the cannula and microelectrode were observed and corrected by referencing the phantom. All 91 first-pass tracks traversed the intended target, and three electrodes required a second mapping track beyond the first penetration due to neurophysiological and intraoperative testing. The results showed overall ultra-high (0-0.5 mm) to high (>0.5-1 mm) accuracy, an average Euclidean error of 0.66±0.30 mm, and a radial error of 0.45±0.28 mm with dimensional errors of less than 0.5 mm per axis. The utilization of a stereotactic phantom is an important tool to enhance the stereotactic targeting before insertion into the brain. This phantom technique yielded ultra-high to high accuracy in error calculations. Future methods and studies should focus on error minimization to enhance these DBS mechanical accuracy and correlations with clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.