Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221362›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Utilizing Modified Coopland's Scoring System to Identify and Predict the Outcome of High-Risk Pregnancies in Resource-Limited Settings: A Retrospective Review.

Bhoomika Biradar, Manoj Mathew, Naveen Ramesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhoomika BiradarRural Service, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, IND.
Manoj MathewRural Service, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, IND.
Naveen RameshCommunity Health, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction A high-risk pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. Women with high-risk pregnancies are at a greater risk of developing antepartum haemorrhage, miscarriages, and the need for surgical interventions. Neonatal complications include preterm births, low birth weight (LBW), intra-uterine deaths and an increased need for NICU admission. The utilisation of low-cost scoring tools for identifying high-risk women can aid in early diagnosis and timely implementation of therapeutic interventions.  Objective The retrospective record-based study sought to calculate the proportion of high-risk pregnancies using modified Coopland's scoring system and compare the maternal and foetal outcomes among high-risk pregnancies. Methods The study retrospectively analysed the records of antenatal women in their third trimester from the years December 2018 to December 2021. Each record was then numerically assessed according to the modified Coopland's scoring system and categorised according to the risk status. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were then compared across the risk groups. Results The data included 300 cases over a three-year period. According to modified Coopland's scoring system, we found that the overall proportion of high-risk pregnancies was 18.3%. Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were increased in high-risk pregnancy groups when compared to low-risk pregnancies, miscarriages (31.6% vs 15.8%) and antepartum haemorrhage (55.6% vs 11.1%). Babies born to high-risk mothers had a higher chance of developing LBW status (52.0%) and respiratory distress (45.5%) when compared to those born to low-risk mothers: 8.0% and 13.6%, respectively. Conclusion A notable portion of pregnant women were classified as high-risk using modified Coopland's scoring tool and would benefit from targeted obstetric care.

Indexed as

antenatal screeninghigh-risk pregnancieslow birth weightmaternal mortalitymodified coopland’s scoring systemperinatal mortalitypreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID39221362
PMCPMC11365587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.