Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39221329›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Surgical Conundrum: Addressing a Large Nasal Defect Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Alexis Arza, Gabriella Vasile, Christopher Buckley

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis ArzaDermatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Gabriella VasileMohs Micrographic Surgery, Réforme Dermatology, Charleston, USA.
Christopher BuckleyMohs Micrographic Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing large nasal defects following Mohs surgery presents complex reconstructive challenges due to the nose's prominent and visible nature. These cases require a careful balance of preserving structural integrity, optimizing cosmetic outcomes, and maintaining vascular health. In situations where primary closure is impractical due to defect size and location, innovative techniques like the double rhomboid transposition flap offer versatile solutions, addressing both aesthetic concerns and functional requirements. The double rhomboid flap allows surgeons to achieve continuity of surrounding tissue, ensuring aesthetically pleasing texture, color, and thickness while minimizing complications like skin tension and potential airway issues. This case highlights the reconstructive challenges faced in managing large nasal defects following Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma. An 84-year-old male presented with a significant nasal defect following Mohs surgery that involved the dorsum, sidewall, tip, and ala, complicating primary closure due to skin tension and cosmetic concerns. Utilizing a double rhomboid transposition flap technique allowed for effective aesthetic and structural reconstruction, addressing skin tension and preserving nasal symmetry. This case emphasizes the importance of tailored reconstructive strategies to achieve optimal cosmetic and functional outcomes in complex nasal Mohs defects.

Indexed as

basal cell carcinomadermatologyfacial plastic surgerymohs micrographic surgerynasal defect

Identifiers

PMID39221329
PMCPMC11365523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.